The Fourth Amendment applies to a search only if a person has a “legitimate expectation of privacy” in the place or thing searched. If not, the Fourth Amendment offers no protection because there are, by definition, no privacy issues.
Courts use a two-part test (fashioned by the U.S. Supreme Court) to determine whether, at the time of the search, a defendant had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the place or things searched:
For example, a person who uses a public restroom expects not to be spied upon (the person has an expectation of privacy) and most people — including judges and juries — would consider that expectation to be reasonable (there is an objective expectation of privacy as well). Therefore, the installation of a hidden video camera by the police in a public restroom will be considered a “search” and would be subject to the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of reasonableness.
Conviction of Guilt Without Regard to Intent or State of Mind In the criminal justice system, offenses are commonly cat... Read More
Recovering Compensation Without Proving Negligence Most personal injury claims are based on a legal theory of negligenc... Read More
The Duties Owed to Social Guests and Workers | How Liability Is Determined You've been invited to a party by a friend o... Read More
How It Works