The Fourth Amendment applies to a search only if a person has a “legitimate expectation of privacy” in the place or thing searched. If not, the Fourth Amendment offers no protection because there are, by definition, no privacy issues.
Courts use a two-part test (fashioned by the U.S. Supreme Court) to determine whether, at the time of the search, a defendant had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the place or things searched:
For example, a person who uses a public restroom expects not to be spied upon (the person has an expectation of privacy) and most people — including judges and juries — would consider that expectation to be reasonable (there is an objective expectation of privacy as well). Therefore, the installation of a hidden video camera by the police in a public restroom will be considered a “search” and would be subject to the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of reasonableness.
Emotional distress is a real injury with serious consequences, and the law allows victims to seek compensation in many s... Read More
Landlords have a legal duty to keep rental homes safe and livable. When dangerous conditions go unaddressed, tenants may... Read More
Time is one of the most important factors in any legal dispute, yet it is also one of the most misunderstood. Every sta... Read More
How It Works